LIWPX vs. WGROX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) and WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 5 years, LIWPX returned 9.76%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for WGROX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIWPX charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WGROX.

Performance

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIWPX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than WGROX's 5.21% return.

LIWPX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -1.77%
• 6M: 7.41%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.31%

WGROX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: -1.84%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: 5.82%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: 10.84%
• ALL TIME*: 11.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	10.50%	21.32%	14.17%	21.22%	-18.52%	18.51%	15.12%	5.67%
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	5.21%	-10.37%	13.13%	33.43%	-30.86%	20.76%	36.73%	6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LIWPX and WGROX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.86

The correlation between LIWPX and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIWPX vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIWPX

LIWPX Risk / Return Rank: 49
LIWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LIWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LIWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LIWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

WGROX

WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIWPX	WGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	-0.11	+1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	-0.02	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.00	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	-0.14	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.37	-0.36	+9.72

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIWPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the WGROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIWPX and WGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIWPX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWPX and WGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIWPX	WGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-61.61%	+28.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-15.58%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.97%	-27.61%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.57%	-40.16%	+13.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-14.65%	+12.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-9.91%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	6.14%	-3.90%

Volatility

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) is 3.80%, while Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that LIWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIWPX	WGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	5.79%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	14.75%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	19.67%	-6.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	23.12%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.53%	23.31%	-4.78%

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIWPX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIWPX vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison

LIWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than WGROX's 8.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	1.41%	1.57%	0.00%	1.76%	1.50%	1.58%	1.13%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	8.13%	8.55%	9.22%	0.00%	0.71%	16.82%	7.21%	10.73%	10.14%	6.24%	0.15%	12.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIWPX and WGROX in my portfolio?

LIWPX and WGROX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIWPX or WGROX?

WGROX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to LIWPX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWPX dropped -33.12% vs WGROX's -61.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.