LIWPX vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both funds - LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, LIWPX returned 9.48%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for COWZ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIWPX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIWPX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.41% return.

LIWPX

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 24.26%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: —

COWZ

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	9.12%	21.32%	14.17%	21.22%	-18.52%	18.51%	15.12%	5.67%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	6.41%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LIWPX and COWZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.77

The correlation between LIWPX and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIWPX vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIWPX

LIWPX Risk / Return Rank: 51
LIWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LIWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LIWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LIWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LIWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIWPX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.74	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.58	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.88	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	10.52	+1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIWPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIWPX and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIWPX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	1.74	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.58	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.64	+0.03

Drawdowns

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIWPX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWPX and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIWPX	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-38.63%	+5.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-5.00%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.97%	-22.00%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.57%	-22.00%	-4.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-2.53%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-4.80%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.84%	+0.32%

Volatility

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.92%. This indicates that LIWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIWPX	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	2.92%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	7.21%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	11.16%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	17.64%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	19.92%	-1.33%

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIWPX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIWPX vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

LIWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than COWZ's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.94%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	1.44%	1.57%	0.00%	1.76%	1.50%	1.58%	1.13%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIWPX and COWZ in my portfolio?

LIWPX and COWZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIWPX or COWZ?

LIWPX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to COWZ (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWPX dropped -33.12% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.