PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIVKX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K (LIVKX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIVKX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LIVKX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.14% annualized return.


LIVKX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.47%
6M
10.84%
YTD
11.66%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
11.94%

FRQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.17%
6M
3.42%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIVKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K
11.66%21.57%13.65%21.61%-18.33%18.87%14.98%26.90%-7.84%21.51%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LIVKX and FRQIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.86

The correlation between LIVKX and FRQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIVKX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIVKX
LIVKX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LIVKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K (LIVKX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIVKXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.39

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

9.97

+0.55

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIVKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIVKX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIVKX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIVKX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIVKXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.39%

-38.01%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-3.43%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-5.21%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.44%

-17.04%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.39%

-17.04%

-17.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.42%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-4.42%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

0.82%

+1.38%

Volatility

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K (LIVKX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that LIVKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIVKXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

1.59%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

3.66%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

4.32%

+9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

5.60%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

5.28%

+11.40%

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIVKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIVKX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

LIVKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than FRQIX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.22%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%
LIVKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Class K
2.27%2.53%0.01%2.08%2.02%2.08%1.61%3.00%2.40%2.31%1.57%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIVKX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIVKX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FRQIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIVKX dropped -34.39% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIVKX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer