LITX vs. RGTU

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LITX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.

Performance

LITX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LITX

• 1D: -5.34%
• 1M: 14.10%
• 6M: 77.48%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RGTU

• 1D: -7.80%
• 1M: -20.70%
• 6M: -47.62%
• YTD: -70.92%
• 1Y: -70.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -41.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	$85.73M	$72.94M	$186.00M
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	$1.54M	$1.48M	$6.02M

LITX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	199.57%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-69.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LITX and RGTU is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

LITX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LITX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 10
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LITX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.87	—

Drawdowns

LITX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -73.97%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITX	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.97%	-97.93%	+23.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-97.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.43%	-96.75%	+44.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-67.14%	+41.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	80.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LITX	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	56.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	143.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	199.35%	213.13%	-13.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	199.35%	215.70%	-16.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	199.35%	215.70%	-16.35%

LITX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LITX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

LITX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.95%.

Position	TTM	2025
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	70.95%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LITX and RGTU in my portfolio?

LITX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LITX or RGTU?

On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LITX or RGTU?

RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LITX or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 70.95%, compared with 0.00% for LITX.

What is the main difference between LITX and RGTU?

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 1.30% for RGTU.