LITX vs. FUTG
LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LITX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
LITX vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LITX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -71.11%
- YTD
- -75.86%
- 6M
- -77.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 335.33% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -74.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITX and FUTG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITX vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LITX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 32.05 | -0.66 | +32.71 |
Drawdowns
LITX vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -51.46%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.46% | -86.19% | +34.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.05% | -84.51% | +59.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.60% | -40.62% | +26.02% |
Volatility
LITX vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITX | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.92% | 135.59% | +63.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.92% | 135.59% | +63.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.92% | 135.59% | +63.33% |
LITX vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITX vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LITX nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LITX and FUTG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
LITX and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for LITX and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer