LITE vs. CCNR
LITE (Lumentum Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) is Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. Over the past year, LITE returned 1060.78% vs 54.76% for CCNR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LITE vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITE achieves a 159.70% return, which is significantly higher than CCNR's 21.64% return.
LITE
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 159.70%
- 6M
- 186.01%
- 1Y
- 1,060.78%
- 3Y*
- 154.90%
- 5Y*
- 63.84%
- 10Y*
- 44.00%
CCNR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- 54.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITE vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 159.70% | 339.06% | 49.22% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 21.64% | 46.48% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITE and CCNR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITE vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank
LITE
CCNR
LITE vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITE | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.50 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.36 | 7.01 | +30.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 136.64 | 24.58 | +112.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITE vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITE and CCNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITE | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.89% | -20.06% | -46.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.70% | -7.85% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -5.43% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.57% | -3.59% | -19.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 2.23% | +5.60% |
Volatility
LITE vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison
Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a higher volatility of 28.34% compared to ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) at 6.77%. This indicates that LITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITE | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.34% | 6.77% | +21.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.79% | 13.89% | +55.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.52% | 18.68% | +67.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.98% | 20.12% | +39.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.63% | 20.12% | +36.51% |
Dividends
LITE vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison
LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.86% | 3.48% | 1.27% |
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITE and CCNR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LITE has higher volatility (28.34%) compared to CCNR (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITE dropped -66.89% vs CCNR's -20.06%.
LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.42 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LITE and CCNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer