PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LISAX vs. LAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LISAX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than LAFFX's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LISAX has underperformed LAFFX with an annualized return of 1.99%, while LAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


LISAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
1.99%

LAFFX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.96%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.75%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LISAX
Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund
1.45%5.22%2.15%5.89%-10.61%2.08%4.16%7.85%1.14%5.09%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
9.29%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LISAX and LAFFX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2003

-0.09

The correlation between LISAX and LAFFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LISAX vs. LAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LISAX
LISAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LISAXLAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.38

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.87

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

12.02

-5.03

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LISAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the LAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LISAX and LAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LISAXLAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.08

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.68

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.45

+0.51

Drawdowns

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LISAX drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, smaller than the maximum LAFFX drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LISAX and LAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LISAXLAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-60.50%

+45.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-7.59%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-15.38%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-19.50%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.18%

-39.59%

+24.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-9.02%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.81%

-0.84%

Volatility

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) is 0.96%, while Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that LISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LISAXLAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.78%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

8.32%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43%

10.46%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.37%

14.61%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

17.44%

-13.75%

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LISAX and LAFFX have an expense ratio of 0.71%.


Dividends

LISAX vs. LAFFX - Dividend Comparison

LISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than LAFFX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.58%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%
LISAX
Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund
3.44%3.95%2.91%2.51%1.80%2.06%2.33%2.85%2.62%2.42%2.60%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


LISAX and LAFFX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAFFX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to LISAX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LISAX dropped -15.18% vs LAFFX's -60.50%.

LISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LISAX and LAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer