PortfoliosLab logo
LISAX vs. CGMU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LISAX and CGMU is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LISAX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

11.00%12.00%13.00%14.00%15.00%16.00%17.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.81%
14.45%
LISAX
CGMU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LISAX:

0.31

CGMU:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

LISAX:

0.43

CGMU:

0.70

Omega Ratio

LISAX:

1.07

CGMU:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

LISAX:

0.22

CGMU:

0.58

Martin Ratio

LISAX:

1.05

CGMU:

1.84

Ulcer Index

LISAX:

1.23%

CGMU:

1.13%

Daily Std Dev

LISAX:

4.14%

CGMU:

4.01%

Max Drawdown

LISAX:

-14.69%

CGMU:

-4.11%

Current Drawdown

LISAX:

-3.66%

CGMU:

-1.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LISAX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than CGMU's -0.08% return.


LISAX

YTD

-0.73%

1M

2.03%

6M

-0.68%

1Y

1.30%

5Y*

1.47%

10Y*

1.87%

CGMU

YTD

-0.08%

1M

0.88%

6M

-0.26%

1Y

2.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LISAX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LISAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LISAX vs. CGMU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LISAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LISAX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LISAX is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LISAX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LISAX is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LISAX is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LISAX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGMU is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGMU is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGMU is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LISAX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LISAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LISAX and CGMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.31
0.50
LISAX
CGMU

Dividends

LISAX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

LISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than CGMU's 3.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LISAX
Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund
3.02%3.16%2.74%2.37%2.23%2.33%2.64%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.76%2.90%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.27%3.22%3.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LISAX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LISAX drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LISAX and CGMU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.25%
-1.83%
LISAX
CGMU

Volatility

LISAX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund (LISAX) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 1.31%. This indicates that LISAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.04%
1.31%
LISAX
CGMU