PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIRKX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIRKX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 6.08%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.


LIRKX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.64%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.07%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
6.08%

WFSPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.77%
6M
8.77%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIRKX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund
5.30%12.48%6.08%11.48%-15.21%6.75%11.46%15.90%-3.50%10.75%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
9.77%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LIRKX and WFSPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011

0.85

The correlation between LIRKX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIRKX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIRKX
LIRKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LIRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LIRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIRKXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.01

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

13.58

+0.59

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIRKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIRKX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIRKX drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRKX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIRKXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-58.21%

+37.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-8.90%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-18.74%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.46%

-24.51%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.46%

-33.74%

+13.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.72%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-12.76%

+9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.97%

-1.01%

Volatility

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) is 2.40%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that LIRKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIRKXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

4.67%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

9.83%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92%

12.49%

-6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

16.97%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

18.07%

-10.53%

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIRKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LIRKX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

LIRKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than WFSPX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIRKX
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund
3.69%3.89%2.06%2.67%2.75%2.74%1.98%2.48%2.50%2.28%2.53%2.98%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.59%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIRKX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFSPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to LIRKX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIRKX dropped -20.46% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

LIRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIRKX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer