PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIO.L vs. BSIF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) and Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIO.L achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than BSIF.L's 41.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LIO.L has outperformed BSIF.L with an annualized return of 8.21%, while BSIF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.


LIO.L

1D
1.64%
1M
23.46%
YTD
16.95%
6M
21.76%
1Y
-7.03%
3Y*
-16.87%
5Y*
-19.70%
10Y*
8.21%

BSIF.L

1D
0.22%
1M
17.87%
YTD
41.64%
6M
37.82%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
-2.41%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
6.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIO.L
Liontrust Asset Management
16.95%-34.62%-14.25%-37.55%-45.27%74.21%21.37%95.83%23.19%32.23%
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
41.64%-19.30%-13.74%-6.53%16.69%1.89%-2.51%22.16%11.37%15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LIO.L and BSIF.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.15

The correlation between LIO.L and BSIF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LIO.L:

£0.43

BSIF.L:

-£0.06

PS Ratio

LIO.L:

0.59

BSIF.L:

76.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIO.L:

£332.67M

BSIF.L:

£7.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIO.L:

£168.56M

BSIF.L:

-£4.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

LIO.L:

£68.22M

BSIF.L:

-£30.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIO.L
LIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BSIF.L
BSIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) and Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIO.LBSIF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.10

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.33

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

0.61

-0.88

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIO.L and BSIF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIO.LBSIF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

0.30

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

0.09

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.34

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.36

-0.18

Drawdowns

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, which is greater than BSIF.L's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIO.L and BSIF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIO.LBSIF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.10%

-40.05%

-45.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.01%

-28.46%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.98%

-35.91%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.06%

-40.05%

-45.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.06%

-40.05%

-45.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.96%

-13.05%

-66.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-7.29%

-28.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.57%

15.47%

+10.10%

Volatility

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) is 8.56%, while Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) has a volatility of 15.83%. This indicates that LIO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSIF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIO.LBSIF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

15.83%

-7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.20%

24.05%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.10%

31.57%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.04%

21.74%

+19.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.46%

18.08%

+22.38%

Dividends

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Dividend Comparison

LIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.36%, more than BSIF.L's 9.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
9.83%12.99%9.34%7.25%6.03%6.43%6.06%5.86%6.00%3.38%6.82%7.11%
LIO.L
Liontrust Asset Management
18.36%21.47%15.13%11.43%6.43%2.64%2.69%2.64%3.95%3.27%3.39%3.22%

Financials

LIO.L vs. BSIF.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liontrust Asset Management and Bluefield Solar Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
69.45M
11.85M
(LIO.L) Total Revenue
(BSIF.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LIO.L and BSIF.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIO.L and BSIF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer