LIO.L vs. IHR.L
LIO.L (Liontrust Asset Management) and IHR.L (Impact Healthcare REIT plc) are both stocks. LIO.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while IHR.L operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate). At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LIO.L
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- -16.87%
- 5Y*
- -19.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
IHR.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIO.L Liontrust Asset Management | 16.95% | -34.62% | -14.25% | -37.55% | -45.27% | 74.21% | 21.37% | 95.83% | 23.19% | 31.72% |
IHR.L Impact Healthcare REIT plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.05% | -14.13% | -11.89% | 9.78% | 0.99% | 5.90% | 1.16% | -1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIO.L and IHR.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
LIO.L:
£332.67M
IHR.L:
£100.24M
LIO.L:
£168.56M
IHR.L:
£98.71M
LIO.L:
£68.22M
IHR.L:
-£2.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIO.L vs. IHR.L — Risk / Return Rank
LIO.L
IHR.L
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) and Impact Healthcare REIT plc (IHR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIO.L | IHR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIO.L | IHR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIO.L | IHR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.96% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.57% | — | — |
Volatility
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIO.L | IHR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.10% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.04% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.46% | — | — |
Dividends
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Dividend Comparison
LIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.36%, while IHR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHR.L Impact Healthcare REIT plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 1.49% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIO.L Liontrust Asset Management | 18.36% | 21.47% | 15.13% | 11.43% | 6.43% | 2.64% | 2.69% | 2.64% | 3.95% | 3.27% | 3.39% | 3.22% |
Financials
LIO.L vs. IHR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liontrust Asset Management and Impact Healthcare REIT plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LIO.L and IHR.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LIO.L and IHR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer