LINT vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

LINT vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 744.89% return, which is significantly higher than FFUT's 8.83% return.

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	8.83%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and FFUT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

LINT vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LINT	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.55	—

Drawdowns

LINT vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.54%	-4.33%	-45.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.86%	-4.33%	-8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-0.96%	-19.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	168.83%	11.22%	+157.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.83%	11.02%	+157.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.83%	11.02%	+157.81%

LINT vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FFUT's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.92%	2.09%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and FFUT in my portfolio?

LINT and FFUT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or FFUT?

On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or FFUT?

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between LINT and FFUT?

LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.80% for FFUT.