PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINT vs. BEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINT vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LINT having a 562.84% return and BEG slightly lower at 552.25%.


LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BEG

1D
-9.38%
1M
-7.23%
YTD
552.25%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%-2.36%
BEG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF
552.25%-5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and BEG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINT vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LINT vs. BEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINTBEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

24.05

24.77

-0.72

Drawdowns

LINT vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and BEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINTBEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-59.85%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.55%

-13.90%

-12.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-16.14%

-4.37%

Volatility

LINT vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINTBEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

163.04%

213.85%

-50.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

163.04%

213.85%

-50.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

163.04%

213.85%

-50.81%

LINT vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINT vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LINT and BEG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 0.75% for BEG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and BEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer