LIN vs. FLJH
LIN (Linde plc) is a stock, while FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) is Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Over the past 5 years, LIN returned 13.98%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for FLJH. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIN vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIN achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than FLJH's 18.85% return.
LIN
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 26.61%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 45.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- —
LIN vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | 23.59% | 3.22% | 3.18% | 27.66% | -4.39% | 33.39% | 25.88% | 39.04% | -5.26% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 18.85% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -17.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIN and FLJH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LIN and FLJH has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIN vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
LIN
FLJH
LIN vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linde plc (LIN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIN | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.45 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 4.20 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 16.28 | -14.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIN vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIN drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIN and FLJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIN | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -31.51% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.18% | -10.80% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -20.39% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.82% | -20.39% | -2.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.30% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -5.30% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 2.78% | +4.01% |
Volatility
LIN vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
Linde plc (LIN) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 5.20%. This indicates that LIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIN | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 5.20% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.53% | 14.09% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 18.44% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 18.61% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 19.84% | +4.24% |
Dividends
LIN vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FLJH's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.28% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
LIN Linde plc | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIN and FLJH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIN has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to FLJH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIN dropped -32.59% vs FLJH's -31.51%.
FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIN and FLJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer