PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIN vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIN vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Linde plc (LIN) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIN achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 7.29% return.


LIN

1D
1.58%
1M
3.78%
YTD
23.59%
6M
26.61%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
48.78%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIN vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LIN
Linde plc
23.59%3.22%3.18%27.66%-4.39%33.39%25.88%39.04%-5.26%
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-29.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LIN and AAPL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between LIN and AAPL has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIN:

$244.15B

AAPL:

$4.30T

EPS

LIN:

$15.16

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

LIN:

34.54

AAPL:

35.35

PEG Ratio

LIN:

1.72

AAPL:

4.65

PS Ratio

LIN:

7.10

AAPL:

9.60

PB Ratio

LIN:

6.33

AAPL:

40.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIN:

$34.66B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIN:

$15.94B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

LIN:

$12.31B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIN vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIN
LIN Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIN vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linde plc (LIN) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

3.40

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

8.47

-6.58

LIN vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIN and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIN vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIN drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIN and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-81.80%

+49.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.18%

-13.80%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-33.36%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-33.36%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.64%

+7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-29.59%

+24.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

5.53%

+1.26%

Volatility

LIN vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Linde plc (LIN) is 5.57%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that LIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

6.73%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

16.53%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

22.64%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

27.52%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

28.92%

-4.84%

Dividends

LIN vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
LIN
Linde plc
1.18%1.41%1.33%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LIN vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linde plc and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
8.78B
111.18B
(LIN) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LIN vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Linde plc and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.5%
49.3%
Portfolio components
LIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

LIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

LIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIN and AAPL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to LIN (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIN dropped -32.59% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIN and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer