LIMI vs. URA

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

LIMI (Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIMI is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LIMI returned 67.12% vs 20.03% for URA. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

LIMI vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMI achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 0.56% return.

LIMI

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -20.27%
• 6M: -17.03%
• YTD: -7.47%
• 1Y: 67.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -5.60%
• 6M: -14.59%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 31.51%
• 5Y*: 20.70%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIMI vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	-7.47%	91.22%	-0.82%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	0.56%	67.18%	-1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LIMI and URA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

LIMI vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIMI

LIMI Risk / Return Rank: 50
LIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 19
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIMI vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIMI	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.42	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.95	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.11	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	0.66	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	1.35	+5.15

LIMI vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMI and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIMI vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMI drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMI and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIMI	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-93.54%	+49.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.47%	-32.60%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.47%	-51.23%	+19.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.42%	-74.82%	+61.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.03%	15.98%	-5.95%

Volatility

LIMI vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 12.05%. This indicates that LIMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIMI	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.96%	12.05%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.72%	38.58%	-7.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.09%	51.25%	-6.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.82%	43.92%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.82%	37.94%	+3.88%

LIMI vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIMI vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

LIMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than URA's 4.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	0.59%	0.54%	8.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.85%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIMI and URA in my portfolio?

LIMI and URA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIMI or URA?

LIMI has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to URA (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIMI dropped -43.77% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, LIMI or URA?

On 1-year performance, LIMI leads with 67.12% vs 20.03% for URA. On fees, LIMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, URA has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIMI or URA?

Over the 1-year period, LIMI has performed better with a 67.12% return vs 20.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIMI or URA?

LIMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIMI or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.59% for LIMI.

What is the main difference between LIMI and URA?

LIMI is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while URA is Uranium. LIMI tracks BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LIMI and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.