LIMI vs. UNHU
LIMI (Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIMI is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. LIMI is passively managed, while UNHU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. LIMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.
Performance
LIMI vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LIMI
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -10.38%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 33.44%
- 1Y
- 146.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHU
- 1D
- 10.16%
- 1M
- 17.42%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LIMI vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF | 13.32% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 105.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIMI and UNHU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIMI vs. UNHU — Risk / Return Rank
LIMI
UNHU
LIMI vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIMI | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIMI | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 57.76 | -56.31 |
Drawdowns
LIMI vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIMI drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMI and UNHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIMI | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.77% | -11.68% | -32.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.65% | -2.71% | -10.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -2.99% | -10.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | — | — |
Volatility
LIMI vs. UNHU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIMI | UNHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.73% | 69.61% | -25.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.40% | 69.61% | -28.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.40% | 69.61% | -28.21% |
LIMI vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIMI vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison
LIMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 8.14% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIMI and UNHU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LIMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LIMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.
LIMI has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.
LIMI is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while UNHU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LIMI and 0.97% for UNHU.
Find the right allocation for LIMI and UNHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer