LIGYX vs. ESGYX
LIGYX (Loomis Sayles International Growth Fund) and ESGYX (Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - LIGYX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Natixis, while ESGYX is a Global Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 5 years, LIGYX returned 1.63%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for ESGYX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIGYX achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly lower than ESGYX's 0.20% return.
LIGYX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -2.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGYX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- —
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIGYX Loomis Sayles International Growth Fund | -4.94% | 9.53% | 13.96% | 20.81% | -17.49% | -3.79% | 1.08% |
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | 0.20% | 15.23% | 13.38% | 18.63% | -22.36% | 18.06% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIGYX and ESGYX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between LIGYX and ESGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIGYX vs. ESGYX — Risk / Return Rank
LIGYX
ESGYX
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles International Growth Fund (LIGYX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIGYX | ESGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.14 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.90 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 3.06 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIGYX | ESGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 0.80 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.35 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.73 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIGYX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than ESGYX's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIGYX and ESGYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIGYX | ESGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.11% | -34.88% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.58% | -11.49% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -16.67% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.13% | -34.88% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -2.10% | -8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -6.45% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.12% | 3.41% | +5.71% |
Volatility
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles International Growth Fund (LIGYX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) at 3.31%. This indicates that LIGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIGYX | ESGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 3.31% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 10.33% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 13.01% | +5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 17.64% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 17.66% | +3.03% |
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LIGYX and ESGYX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
LIGYX vs. ESGYX - Dividend Comparison
LIGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than ESGYX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | 4.14% | 4.44% | 1.99% | 0.61% | 5.28% | 12.16% | 0.54% | 1.84% | 4.39% | 1.15% |
LIGYX Loomis Sayles International Growth Fund | 0.59% | 1.70% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 1.72% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIGYX and ESGYX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIGYX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to ESGYX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIGYX dropped -38.11% vs ESGYX's -34.88%.
ESGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIGYX and ESGYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer