LIFLX vs. LGLIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIFLX (Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund) and LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - LIFLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LGLIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 5 years, LIFLX returned 9.48%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for LGLIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIFLX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for LGLIX.

Performance

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund (LIFLX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFLX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than LGLIX's 10.47% return.

LIFLX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 19.17%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: —

LGLIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 6.80%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 28.69%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LIFLX Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund	1.55%	19.02%	21.38%	14.33%	-9.71%	28.30%	5.17%	5.19%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	10.47%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFLX and LGLIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.59

The correlation between LIFLX and LGLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIFLX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFLX

LIFLX Risk / Return Rank: 29
LIFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LIFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
LIFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
LIFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LIFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund (LIFLX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIFLX	LGLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.30	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.77	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.30	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	3.76	+3.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFLX and LGLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIFLX	LGLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.30	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.45	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.70	-0.20

Drawdowns

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFLX drawdown since its inception was -47.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LGLIX drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFLX and LGLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIFLX	LGLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.12%	-45.95%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.22%	-21.01%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.43%	-29.25%	+12.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.94%	-45.95%	+23.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.96%	0.00%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-9.34%	+3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	7.27%	-4.98%

Volatility

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund (LIFLX) is 2.72%, while Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that LIFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIFLX	LGLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	5.23%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	15.72%	-7.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	21.07%	-10.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.41%	25.84%	-9.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	24.79%	-1.25%

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFLX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIFLX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

LIFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than LGLIX's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.80%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%
LIFLX Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund	0.65%	0.66%	2.21%	0.00%	38.99%	27.93%	6.48%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIFLX and LGLIX in my portfolio?

LIFLX and LGLIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIFLX or LGLIX?

LGLIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to LIFLX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFLX dropped -47.12% vs LGLIX's -45.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.