LIFAX vs. PQTSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LIFAX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A) and PQTSX (PGIM TIPS Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LIFAX returned 2.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PQTSX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIFAX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PQTSX.

Performance

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFAX achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than PQTSX's 1.59% return.

LIFAX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 5.14%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: 3.79%

PQTSX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 4.64%
• 3Y*: 3.64%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A	1.86%	7.03%	4.53%	3.76%	-5.57%	10.29%	5.94%	4.87%	-1.27%	1.18%
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund	1.59%	6.58%	1.74%	2.34%	-13.56%	7.91%	10.20%	8.19%	-1.64%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFAX and PQTSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.46

Over the past year, LIFAX and PQTSX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

LIFAX vs. PQTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFAX

LIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 84
LIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PQTSX

PQTSX Risk / Return Rank: 29
PQTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PQTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PQTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PQTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PQTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIFAX	PQTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.32	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	2.10	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.25	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.55	2.26	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.03	7.40	+11.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the PQTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFAX and PQTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIFAX	PQTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	1.32	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.13	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.42	+0.04

Drawdowns

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFAX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than PQTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFAX and PQTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIFAX	PQTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-16.40%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.18%	-2.23%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.03%	-4.53%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.56%	-16.40%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-2.91%	+2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-4.87%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.68%	-0.40%

Volatility

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) is 0.67%, while PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that LIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIFAX	PQTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	1.57%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	2.76%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27%	3.81%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	6.34%	-2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.54%	5.68%	-1.14%

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTSX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Dividend Comparison

LIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than PQTSX's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A	4.72%	4.74%	4.00%	3.69%	2.60%	2.35%	3.59%	3.95%	3.95%	3.76%	4.32%	4.21%
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund	5.05%	4.95%	4.39%	3.25%	6.51%	9.54%	2.60%	2.48%	3.26%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIFAX and PQTSX in my portfolio?

LIFAX and PQTSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIFAX or PQTSX?

PQTSX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to LIFAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFAX dropped -18.15% vs PQTSX's -16.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.