LIFAX vs. PQTSX
LIFAX (Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A) and PQTSX (PGIM TIPS Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LIFAX returned 2.67%/yr vs -0.18%/yr for PQTSX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LIFAX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PQTSX.
Performance
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFAX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than PQTSX's -0.05% return.
LIFAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.96%
PQTSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 1.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A | 1.22% | 7.03% | 4.53% | 3.76% | -5.57% | 10.29% | 5.94% | 4.87% | -1.27% | 1.34% |
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund | -0.05% | 6.58% | 1.74% | 2.34% | -13.56% | 7.91% | 10.20% | 8.19% | -1.64% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFAX and PQTSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, LIFAX and PQTSX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFAX vs. PQTSX — Risk / Return Rank
LIFAX
PQTSX
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFAX | PQTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 0.89 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 2.40 | +6.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFAX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than PQTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFAX and PQTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFAX | PQTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -16.40% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | -2.23% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.03% | -3.77% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.56% | -16.40% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -4.47% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -4.86% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.83% | -0.44% |
Volatility
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) is 0.49%, while PGIM TIPS Fund (PQTSX) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that LIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFAX | PQTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.77% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | 3.02% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35% | 3.78% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 6.32% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 5.65% | -1.17% |
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTSX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIFAX vs. PQTSX - Dividend Comparison
LIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than PQTSX's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFAX Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A | 4.42% | 4.74% | 4.00% | 3.69% | 2.60% | 2.35% | 3.59% | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.76% | 4.32% | 4.21% |
PQTSX PGIM TIPS Fund | 5.40% | 4.95% | 4.39% | 3.25% | 6.51% | 9.54% | 2.60% | 2.48% | 3.26% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFAX and PQTSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PQTSX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to LIFAX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFAX dropped -18.15% vs PQTSX's -16.40%.
LIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIFAX and PQTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer