LIDR vs. VRT
LIDR (AEye, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. LIDR operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, LIDR returned -67.24%/yr vs 53.98%/yr for VRT. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LIDR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIDR achieves a -38.04% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 49.17% return.
LIDR
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -19.15%
- 6M
- -30.49%
- YTD
- -38.04%
- 1Y
- -60.42%
- 3Y*
- -59.22%
- 5Y*
- -67.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -63.99%
VRT
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -19.62%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- YTD
- 49.17%
- 1Y
- 70.80%
- 3Y*
- 109.07%
- 5Y*
- 53.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
LIDR AEye, Inc. | $715.55K | $729.07K | $2.05M |
| $1.93B | $1.68B | $1.97B |
LIDR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIDR AEye, Inc. | -38.04% | 44.88% | -44.54% | -84.12% | -90.07% | -56.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 49.17% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 38.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIDR and VRT is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
LIDR:
$52.80M
VRT:
$93.00B
LIDR:
-$0.85
VRT:
$4.42
LIDR:
170.20
VRT:
8.24
LIDR:
0.69
VRT:
19.94
LIDR:
$270.00K
VRT:
$11.48B
LIDR:
-$389.00K
VRT:
$4.31B
LIDR:
-$35.49M
VRT:
$2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIDR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
LIDR
VRT
LIDR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye, Inc. (LIDR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIDR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.22 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 1.63 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 5.58 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIDR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIDR drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDR and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIDR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -71.24% | -28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.55% | -40.70% | -28.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.44% | -61.28% | -35.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.84% | -71.24% | -28.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -35.78% | -63.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -16.29% | -68.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.27% | 12.00% | +32.27% |
Volatility
LIDR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AEye, Inc. (LIDR) is 16.55%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 24.48%. This indicates that LIDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIDR | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 24.48% | -7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.85% | 52.93% | +15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.57% | 64.52% | +33.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.98% | 63.43% | +91.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.67% | 55.31% | +92.36% |
Dividends
LIDR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
LIDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIDR AEye, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
LIDR vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AEye, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LIDR and VRT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to LIDR (16.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDR dropped -99.88% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIDR and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer