LIDR vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LIDR (AEye, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. LIDR operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, LIDR returned -65.58%/yr vs 67.87%/yr for VRT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LIDR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AEye, Inc. (LIDR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIDR achieves a -21.20% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 121.05% return.

LIDR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -23.28%
• YTD: -21.20%
• 6M: -38.82%
• 1Y: 80.10%
• 3Y*: -34.96%
• 5Y*: -65.58%
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: 9.34%
• YTD: 121.05%
• 6M: 115.41%
• 1Y: 202.31%
• 3Y*: 147.70%
• 5Y*: 67.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIDR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LIDR AEye, Inc.	-21.20%	44.88%	-44.54%	-84.12%	-90.07%	-56.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	121.05%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	38.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LIDR and VRT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021	0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap LIDR : $65.56M VRT : $140.37B
EPS LIDR : -$0.98 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio LIDR : 188.04 VRT : 12.91
PB Ratio LIDR : 0.88 VRT : 33.07
Total Revenue (TTM) LIDR : $270.00K VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) LIDR : -$389.00K VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) LIDR : -$35.49M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

LIDR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIDR

LIDR Risk / Return Rank: 70
LIDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LIDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LIDR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LIDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LIDR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 95
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIDR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEye, Inc. (LIDR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIDR	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	3.45	-3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.73	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.46	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	8.04	-6.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	21.32	-19.66

LIDR vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIDR and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIDR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIDR drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIDR and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIDR	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.88%	-71.24%	-28.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.11%	-25.32%	-43.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.37%	-61.28%	-36.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.84%	-71.24%	-28.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.65%	-4.83%	-94.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.03%	-16.22%	-67.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.48%	9.53%	+38.95%

Volatility

LIDR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

AEye, Inc. (LIDR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) have volatilities of 17.48% and 17.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIDR	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.48%	17.12%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.38%	45.12%	+25.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	197.71%	59.08%	+138.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	154.79%	62.12%	+92.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.94%	54.70%	+94.24%

Dividends

LIDR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

LIDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LIDR AEye, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIDR and VRT in my portfolio?

LIDR and VRT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIDR or VRT?

LIDR has higher volatility (17.48%) compared to VRT (17.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIDR dropped -99.88% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.