PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LICYX vs. LGLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LICYX achieves a 18.90% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LICYX has underperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.


LICYX

1D
0.60%
1M
6.76%
YTD
18.90%
6M
21.42%
1Y
32.49%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
9.96%

LGLIX

1D
0.13%
1M
6.80%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.03%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
18.90%31.78%9.57%12.57%-18.62%11.80%17.30%21.73%-17.91%25.52%
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
10.47%16.49%44.97%33.29%-38.73%8.62%77.55%35.02%-1.08%31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LICYX and LGLIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.67

The correlation between LICYX and LGLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LICYX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LICYX
LICYX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLIX
LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LICYXLGLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

1.30

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

1.77

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.30

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.11

3.76

+6.35

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LICYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LICYX and LGLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LICYXLGLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.30

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.74

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.70

-0.34

Drawdowns

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LICYX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LICYX and LGLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LICYXLGLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-45.95%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-21.01%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-29.25%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.99%

-45.95%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-45.95%

+10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-9.34%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

7.27%

-3.93%

Volatility

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) at 5.23%. This indicates that LICYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LICYXLGLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

5.23%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

15.72%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

21.07%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

25.84%

-9.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

24.79%

-7.54%

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LICYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

LICYX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

LICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than LGLIX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
1.80%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%8.01%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
4.44%5.28%4.52%1.98%2.28%12.73%1.33%1.68%2.47%2.17%2.52%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LICYX and LGLIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LICYX has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to LGLIX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LICYX dropped -59.02% vs LGLIX's -45.95%.

LICYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LICYX and LGLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer