LIBD vs. YCS

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - LIBD is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). LIBD is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned -0.58% vs 32.17% for YCS. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

LIBD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 13.59% return.

LIBD

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -3.63%
• 6M: -2.99%
• YTD: -2.05%
• 1Y: -0.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.74%

YCS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 3.19%
• 6M: 14.37%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 1Y: 32.17%
• 3Y*: 20.99%
• 5Y*: 24.56%
• 10Y*: 13.54%
• ALL TIME*: 6.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	$19.06K	$13.20K	$6.36K
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$994.57K	$2.23M	$1.41M

LIBD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	-2.05%	-0.63%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	13.59%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LIBD and YCS is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

LIBD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIBD

LIBD Risk / Return Rank: 11
LIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 86
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIBD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIBD	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	2.05	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	2.56	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.39	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	4.02	-4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	12.81	-12.89

LIBD vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIBD and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIBD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIBD	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-49.56%	+42.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.24%	-8.30%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.12%	-0.02%	-6.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-19.77%	+16.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	2.60%	+0.68%

Volatility

LIBD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) is 1.96%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that LIBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIBD	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	2.59%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	11.84%	-6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	16.32%	-8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.96%	21.07%	-11.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.96%	18.68%	-8.72%

LIBD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIBD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.78%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	11.78%	13.52%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIBD and YCS in my portfolio?

LIBD and YCS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIBD or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to LIBD (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, LIBD or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 32.17% vs -0.58% for LIBD. On fees, LIBD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LIBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIBD or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 32.17% return vs -0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIBD or YCS?

LIBD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIBD or YCS?

LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.78%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between LIBD and YCS?

LIBD is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.