LIBD vs. STIP
LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIBD is actively managed, while STIP is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned 3.91% vs 4.68% for STIP. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
LIBD vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 2.04% return.
LIBD
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
LIBD vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 0.48% | 3.37% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.04% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIBD and STIP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between LIBD and STIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIBD vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
LIBD
STIP
LIBD vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIBD | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.69 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 6.76 | -6.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 26.37 | -25.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIBD | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 3.23 | -2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.07 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
LIBD vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIBD | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -5.50% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -0.69% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -0.03% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.99% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 0.18% | +2.71% |
Volatility
LIBD vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that LIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIBD | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 0.40% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | 0.99% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.08% | 1.46% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.64% | 2.75% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.64% | 2.45% | +7.19% |
LIBD vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIBD vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than STIP's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.50% | 13.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIBD and STIP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIBD has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs STIP's -5.50%.
On 1-year performance, STIP leads with 4.68% vs 3.91% for LIBD. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STIP has performed better with a 4.68% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 4.30% for STIP.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.06% for STIP.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIBD and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer