LIBD vs. IBIH
LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIBD is actively managed, while IBIH is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned -2.03% vs 2.20% for IBIH. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIH.
Performance
LIBD vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly lower than IBIH's 1.04% return.
LIBD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.29%
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $435.14K | $428.04K | $430.49K | |
| $6.78K | $11.16K | $6.65K |
LIBD vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | -2.94% | -0.63% |
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.04% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIBD and IBIH is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between LIBD and IBIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIBD vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank
LIBD
IBIH
LIBD vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIBD | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.76 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 4.68 | -5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIBD vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than IBIH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and IBIH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIBD | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -3.94% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -1.70% | -5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -1.17% | -5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -0.96% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 0.64% | +2.76% |
Volatility
LIBD vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) at 0.68%. This indicates that LIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIBD | IBIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 0.68% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 2.37% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.85% | 3.14% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 4.87% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 4.87% | +5.07% |
LIBD vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIBD vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison
LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than IBIH's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 4.98% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% |
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.89% | 13.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIBD and IBIH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIBD has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to IBIH (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs IBIH's -3.94%.
On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 2.20% vs -2.03% for LIBD. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIH has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 2.20% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 4.98% for IBIH.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.10% for IBIH.
IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIBD and IBIH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer