LIAM vs. IBIH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LIAM (LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIAM is actively managed, while IBIH is passively managed. Over the past year, LIAM returned 3.56% vs 4.93% for IBIH. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIAM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIH.

Performance

LIAM vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAM achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than IBIH's 1.12% return.

LIAM

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: -0.10%
• 1Y: 3.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIH

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAM vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.34%	5.26%	-7.09%
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF	1.12%	8.47%	-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAM and IBIH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.79

The correlation between LIAM and IBIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIAM vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAM

LIAM Risk / Return Rank: 19
LIAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LIAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LIAM Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LIAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LIAM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IBIH

IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 55
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAM vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIAM	IBIH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.57	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	2.42	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.28	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	2.91	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	9.88	-7.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIAM vs. IBIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the IBIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAM and IBIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIAM	IBIH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	1.57	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	1.20	-1.34

Drawdowns

LIAM vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAM drawdown since its inception was -8.39%, which is greater than IBIH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAM and IBIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAM	IBIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-3.94%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-1.70%	-2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-1.09%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-0.96%	-2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	0.50%	+1.36%

Volatility

LIAM vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) at 0.95%. This indicates that LIAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIAM	IBIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	0.95%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	2.14%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	3.17%	+3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.66%	4.94%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.66%	4.94%	+2.72%

LIAM vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIAM vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison

LIAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than IBIH's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF	3.92%	4.68%	4.34%	0.70%
LIAM LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	6.48%	9.02%	1.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAM and IBIH in my portfolio?

LIAM and IBIH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIAM or IBIH?

LIAM has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to IBIH (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAM dropped -8.39% vs IBIH's -3.94%.

Which ETF is better, LIAM or IBIH?

On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 4.93% vs 3.56% for LIAM. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIH has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIAM or IBIH?

Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIAM or IBIH?

IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIAM or IBIH?

LIAM has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 3.92% for IBIH.

What is the main difference between LIAM and IBIH?

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIAM and 0.10% for IBIH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.