PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LI vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -15.53% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 18.99% return.


LI

1D
3.77%
1M
-28.57%
YTD
-15.53%
6M
-16.28%
1Y
-50.47%
3Y*
-23.14%
5Y*
-12.64%
10Y*

KO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.94%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.96%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LI
Li Auto Inc.
-15.53%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%11.34%86.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
18.99%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LI and KO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LI:

$14.50B

KO:

$356.42B

EPS

LI:

-CN¥1.74

KO:

$3.18

PS Ratio

LI:

0.92

KO:

7.23

PB Ratio

LI:

1.41

KO:

10.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

LI:

CN¥108.98B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LI:

CN¥17.42B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

LI:

-CN¥2.83B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.19

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

2.26

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

4.51

-5.86

LI vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LI vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, roughly equal to the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.65%

-68.23%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.95%

-7.87%

-49.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.65%

-16.26%

-54.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.65%

-17.27%

-53.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.35%

-1.16%

-68.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.93%

-16.09%

-23.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.41%

3.98%

+33.43%

Volatility

LI vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.70%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

6.70%

+8.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

12.87%

+15.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.30%

16.73%

+23.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.52%

16.18%

+47.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.32%

18.24%

+50.08%

Dividends

LI vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

LI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.49%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
LI
Li Auto Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LI vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
22.84B
12.47B
(LI) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LI values in CNY, KO values in USD

LI vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Li Auto Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
7.9%
63.0%
Portfolio components
LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LI and KO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LI has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to KO (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -70.65% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer