PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI.PA vs. LBS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LI.PA is traded in EUR, while LBS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LBS.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI.PA achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 26.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LI.PA has underperformed LBS.TO with an annualized return of 4.04%, while LBS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.41% annualized return.


LI.PA

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.17%
6M
6.24%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
4.04%

LBS.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
5.79%
YTD
26.12%
6M
38.00%
1Y
85.92%
3Y*
35.73%
5Y*
23.58%
10Y*
20.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
5.17%28.66%17.45%24.13%11.69%18.41%-42.43%34.58%-22.07%3.30%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
26.12%52.37%30.39%4.93%-3.64%72.92%-10.75%49.01%-25.92%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LI.PA and LBS.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2009

0.28

The correlation between LI.PA and LBS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI.PA
LI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LI.PALBS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.74

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

6.69

-6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

31.98

-30.49

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI.PA and LBS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LI.PALBS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

4.17

-3.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.92

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.52

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.52

-0.16

Drawdowns

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -79.99%, which is greater than LBS.TO's maximum drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and LBS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LI.PALBS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.99%

-65.81%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-12.92%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-34.99%

+21.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.90%

-42.53%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-65.81%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-1.67%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-12.02%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

2.70%

+2.46%

Volatility

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) is 3.95%, while Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that LI.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LI.PALBS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.44%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

17.22%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

20.70%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

25.84%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.72%

39.15%

-3.43%

Dividends

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison

LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than LBS.TO's 8.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
8.24%9.34%13.29%15.23%13.89%11.89%5.56%15.06%17.96%12.05%12.35%14.91%
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
5.43%5.48%3.60%6.93%7.90%4.80%7.35%6.20%7.27%4.96%4.55%3.90%

Financials

LI.PA vs. LBS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Klepierre SA and Life & Banc Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LI.PA values in EUR, LBS.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


LI.PA and LBS.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI.PA and LBS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer