LI.PA vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

LI.PA (Klepierre SA) is a stock, while CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) is Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Over the past 10 years, LI.PA returned 4.49%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for CSH2.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LI.PA is traded in EUR, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI.PA achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LI.PA has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 4.49%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.

LI.PA

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 5.94%
• YTD: 13.10%
• 6M: 13.10%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 25.82%
• 5Y*: 18.65%
• 10Y*: 4.49%

CSH2.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LI.PA Klepierre SA	13.10%	28.66%	21.24%	24.35%	11.69%	13.38%	-42.28%	29.96%	-22.08%	3.31%
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	3.38%	-0.79%	10.71%	6.94%	-3.70%	6.64%	-5.15%	7.23%	-0.54%	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LI.PA and CSH2.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.10

The correlation between LI.PA and CSH2.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI.PA

LI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 73
LI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
LI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CSH2.L

CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LI.PA	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	0.81	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.18	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.15	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.19	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.65	5.38	-1.73

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI.PA and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and CSH2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LI.PA	CSH2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.40%	-24.26%	-54.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-1.49%	-9.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.27%	-4.44%	-8.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.92%	-7.40%	-21.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.00%	-11.59%	-59.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.31%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.53%	-13.78%	-11.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	0.60%	+4.54%

Volatility

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Klepierre SA (LI.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 0.77%. This indicates that LI.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LI.PA	CSH2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	0.77%	+3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	2.52%	+10.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.30%	4.01%	+12.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.88%	5.43%	+20.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.65%	6.77%	+28.88%

Dividends

LI.PA vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LI.PA Klepierre SA	5.05%	5.48%	6.47%	7.09%	7.90%	0.00%	5.98%	3.10%	7.27%	4.96%	4.55%	3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LI.PA and CSH2.L in my portfolio?

LI.PA and CSH2.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.