PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHYAX vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHYAX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 4.52%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.33% annualized return.


LHYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.54%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
4.52%

XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
1.54%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%4.56%15.11%-5.10%8.53%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
5.52%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LHYAX and XYLD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.46

The correlation between LHYAX and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHYAX vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LHYAXXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.27

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

17.16

-6.09

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHYAX and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHYAX drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHYAX and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHYAXXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.68%

-33.46%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-5.29%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-15.53%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-18.66%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.23%

-33.46%

+9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-3.71%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.01%

-0.34%

Volatility

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) is 0.97%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that LHYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHYAXXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

2.21%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

5.76%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

6.80%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

11.26%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

14.22%

-8.49%

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHYAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHYAX vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

LHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than XYLD's 10.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
7.22%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.46%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHYAX and XYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYLD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to LHYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHYAX dropped -31.68% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHYAX and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer