PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHTC.DE vs. PPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LHTC.DE is traded in EUR, while PPH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE has underperformed PPH with an annualized return of 5.88%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively higher 7.73% annualized return.


LHTC.DE

1D
3.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
5.88%

PPH

1D
1.50%
1M
5.49%
YTD
5.37%
6M
8.48%
1Y
21.51%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
-2.55%7.11%3.92%7.59%-6.20%25.48%-1.95%27.54%2.95%4.36%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
5.37%7.52%15.18%3.74%9.00%26.61%-3.21%22.09%-1.47%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LHTC.DE and PPH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.49

The correlation between LHTC.DE and PPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHTC.DE vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHTC.DE
LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHTC.DEPPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

2.16

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.89

4.97

-4.09

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the PPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHTC.DE and PPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LHTC.DEPPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

1.26

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.75

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.44

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.53

-0.09

Drawdowns

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than PPH's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and PPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHTC.DEPPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-31.54%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-10.02%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.48%

-20.54%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.48%

-20.54%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.48%

-28.74%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.60%

-2.05%

-9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-9.92%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

4.34%

+1.33%

Volatility

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) is 5.69%, while VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that LHTC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHTC.DEPPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

6.11%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.03%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

17.13%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

15.19%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

17.46%

-1.89%

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHTC.DE vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison

LHTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.04%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHTC.DE and PPH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LHTC.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LHTC.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.

LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.36% for PPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHTC.DE and PPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer