PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGUK.L achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than EMDG.L's 3.76% return.


LGUK.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.84%
6M
7.53%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

EMDG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
2.93%
YTD
3.76%
6M
4.29%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
6.84%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.62%17.54%-0.17%
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
3.76%2.35%10.43%1.99%0.28%0.96%-26.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LGUK.L and EMDG.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDG.L
EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGUK.LEMDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.66

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

7.73

-0.23

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUK.L and EMDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than EMDG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUK.L and EMDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGUK.LEMDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-30.84%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-3.76%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-7.93%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.30%

-12.32%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-10.65%

+7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-22.06%

+17.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.29%

+1.59%

Volatility

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) at 1.77%. This indicates that LGUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGUK.LEMDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

1.77%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

4.28%

+7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

5.97%

+8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

7.86%

+6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

13.19%

+3.08%

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGUK.L vs. EMDG.L - Dividend Comparison

LGUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.22%5.95%5.95%4.65%2.91%1.21%
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGUK.L and EMDG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EMDG.L.

LGUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EMDG.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while EMDG.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUK.L and 0.25% for EMDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGUK.L and EMDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer