PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGRRX vs. VTMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than VTMGX's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX has outperformed VTMGX with an annualized return of 15.98%, while VTMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.


LGRRX

1D
-1.46%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
-1.49%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
15.98%

VTMGX

1D
-0.65%
1M
4.06%
YTD
15.14%
6M
18.08%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-1.80%13.76%34.82%50.89%-28.03%18.40%31.40%31.41%-2.80%32.29%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.14%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRRX and VTMGX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1999

0.67

The correlation between LGRRX and VTMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGRRX vs. VTMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRRX
LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGRRXVTMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

2.82

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

10.91

-8.74

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the VTMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and VTMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGRRXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.18

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.62

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.31

+0.06

Drawdowns

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, which is greater than VTMGX's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and VTMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGRRXVTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.70%

-60.58%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-11.67%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-13.18%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-29.71%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-35.68%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-0.65%

-4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-14.65%

-6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

3.01%

+2.80%

Volatility

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that LGRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGRRXVTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.98%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

12.54%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

15.09%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

15.87%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

16.54%

+4.51%

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMGX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGRRX vs. VTMGX - Dividend Comparison

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than VTMGX's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.55%2.50%6.30%6.70%18.14%5.13%4.60%2.68%5.92%2.33%1.38%0.42%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.60%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGRRX and VTMGX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to LGRRX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRRX dropped -64.70% vs VTMGX's -60.58%.

VTMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGRRX and VTMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer