LGRRX vs. NEFOX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGRRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and NEFOX (Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund) are both mutual funds - LGRRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while NEFOX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX returned 15.98%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for NEFOX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGRRX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NEFOX.

Performance

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than NEFOX's -2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX has outperformed NEFOX with an annualized return of 15.98%, while NEFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.22% annualized return.

LGRRX

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: -1.80%
• 6M: -1.49%
• 1Y: 10.47%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: 15.98%

NEFOX

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -2.06%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 13.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	-1.80%	13.76%	34.82%	50.89%	-28.03%	18.40%	31.40%	31.41%	-2.80%	32.29%
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund	-2.06%	14.77%	15.71%	30.96%	-13.02%	33.94%	13.08%	26.76%	-13.01%	20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRRX and NEFOX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between LGRRX and NEFOX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGRRX vs. NEFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRRX

LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

NEFOX

NEFOX Risk / Return Rank: 15
NEFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
NEFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NEFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NEFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
NEFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGRRX	NEFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.91	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.41	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.16	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	1.76	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	4.48	-2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the NEFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and NEFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGRRX	NEFOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	0.91	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.50	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.65	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.36	+0.01

Drawdowns

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, roughly equal to the maximum NEFOX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and NEFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRRX	NEFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.70%	-62.35%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.93%	-7.07%	-10.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.84%	-17.25%	-10.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-23.56%	-11.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-41.01%	+6.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.11%	-4.66%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-12.49%	-8.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.81%	3.57%	+2.24%

Volatility

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX) at 3.28%. This indicates that LGRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRRX	NEFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	3.28%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	10.27%	+2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	13.74%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.89%	19.23%	+3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	20.85%	+0.20%

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than NEFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRRX vs. NEFOX - Dividend Comparison

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than NEFOX's 10.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	2.55%	2.50%	6.30%	6.70%	18.14%	5.13%	4.60%	2.68%	5.92%	2.33%	1.38%	0.42%
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund	10.36%	7.14%	6.85%	3.62%	17.00%	7.02%	9.21%	9.34%	10.83%	4.19%	3.66%	4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRRX and NEFOX in my portfolio?

LGRRX and NEFOX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGRRX or NEFOX?

LGRRX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to NEFOX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRRX dropped -64.70% vs NEFOX's -62.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.