PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGRRX vs. GQEPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Investor Shares (GQEPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than GQEPX's 6.44% return.


LGRRX

1D
-1.46%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
-1.49%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
15.98%

GQEPX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.73%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-1.80%13.76%34.82%50.89%-28.03%18.40%31.40%31.41%-9.97%
GQEPX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Investor Shares
6.44%-4.52%28.99%17.39%-2.81%19.90%23.65%27.21%-7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRRX and GQEPX is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.67

The correlation between LGRRX and GQEPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGRRX vs. GQEPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRRX
LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEPX
GQEPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GQEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Investor Shares (GQEPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGRRXGQEPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

0.73

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

1.64

+0.53

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the GQEPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and GQEPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGRRXGQEPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

0.49

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.65

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.71

-0.35

Drawdowns

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, which is greater than GQEPX's maximum drawdown of -28.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and GQEPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGRRXGQEPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.70%

-28.45%

-36.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-6.77%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-18.97%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-20.49%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-9.14%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-5.81%

-15.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

3.02%

+2.79%

Volatility

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Investor Shares (GQEPX) at 3.72%. This indicates that LGRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQEPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGRRXGQEPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

3.72%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

7.71%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

10.09%

+6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

15.87%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

18.72%

+2.33%

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEPX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGRRX vs. GQEPX - Dividend Comparison

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than GQEPX's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQEPX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Investor Shares
6.56%6.98%5.30%0.44%4.46%1.49%0.61%0.63%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LGRRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.55%2.50%6.30%6.70%18.14%5.13%4.60%2.68%5.92%2.33%1.38%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGRRX and GQEPX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGRRX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to GQEPX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRRX dropped -64.70% vs GQEPX's -28.45%.

LGRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGRRX and GQEPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer