PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGRCX vs. NEFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRCX achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than NEFOX's 6.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGRCX having a 13.95% annualized return and NEFOX not far behind at 13.84%.


LGRCX

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.51%
6M
-6.34%
YTD
-6.93%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
13.95%
ALL TIME*
10.01%

NEFOX

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.21%
6M
6.38%
YTD
6.49%
1Y
14.77%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.84%
ALL TIME*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGRCX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C
-6.93%12.90%33.77%49.68%-28.62%17.50%30.41%30.47%-3.53%31.39%
NEFOX
Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund
6.49%14.77%15.71%30.96%-13.02%33.94%13.08%26.76%-13.01%20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRCX and NEFOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2003

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between LGRCX and NEFOX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGRCX vs. NEFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGRCX
LGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
LGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFOX
NEFOX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NEFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGRCXNEFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.20

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

2.26

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

5.63

-6.09

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NEFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRCX and NEFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRCX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, smaller than the maximum NEFOX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRCX and NEFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGRCXNEFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-62.35%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.16%

-7.07%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.96%

-17.25%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

-23.56%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-41.01%

+5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-0.46%

-9.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-12.45%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

2.71%

+3.90%

Volatility

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX) at 4.73%. This indicates that LGRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGRCXNEFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

4.73%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

10.37%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

14.19%

+3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

19.19%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

20.76%

+0.46%

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRCX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NEFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGRCX vs. NEFOX - Dividend Comparison

LGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than NEFOX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGRCX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C
3.33%3.10%7.70%8.01%21.28%5.81%5.14%2.60%6.05%2.18%1.36%0.00%
NEFOX
Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund
9.52%7.14%6.85%3.62%17.00%7.02%9.21%9.34%10.83%4.19%3.66%4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGRCX and NEFOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGRCX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to NEFOX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRCX dropped -58.53% vs NEFOX's -62.35%.

NEFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGRCX and NEFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer