LGRCX vs. CHASX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGRCX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C) and CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX returned 15.13%/yr vs 20.30%/yr for CHASX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGRCX charges 1.65%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for CHASX.

Performance

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRCX achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 26.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRCX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.30% annualized return.

LGRCX

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: -2.10%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

CHASX

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 52.42%
• 3Y*: 42.07%
• 5Y*: 22.29%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	-2.10%	12.90%	33.77%	49.68%	-28.62%	17.50%	30.41%	30.47%	-3.53%	31.39%
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	26.01%	20.61%	64.71%	25.91%	-20.41%	22.32%	18.27%	42.63%	-3.96%	24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRCX and CHASX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2003	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between LGRCX and CHASX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGRCX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGRCX

LGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 8
LGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
LGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CHASX

CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGRCX	CHASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	3.04	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	3.93	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.51	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	5.36	-4.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.95	23.07	-21.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRCX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGRCX	CHASX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	3.04	-2.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	1.11	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	1.02	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.63	-0.13

Drawdowns

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRCX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRCX and CHASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRCX	CHASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.53%	-45.94%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.16%	-9.90%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.96%	-23.40%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.31%	-24.63%	-10.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	-30.40%	-4.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-0.65%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.10%	-9.15%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	2.30%	+3.64%

Volatility

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C (LGRCX) is 4.45%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that LGRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRCX	CHASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	5.59%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	13.62%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	17.48%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.12%	20.23%	+2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.16%	19.88%	+1.28%

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRCX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRCX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

LGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than CHASX's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	7.24%	9.12%	36.67%	5.80%	5.49%	20.15%	7.83%	22.82%	12.92%	11.92%	9.14%	10.24%
LGRCX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C	3.16%	3.10%	7.70%	8.01%	21.28%	5.81%	5.14%	2.60%	6.05%	2.18%	1.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRCX and CHASX in my portfolio?

LGRCX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGRCX or CHASX?

CHASX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to LGRCX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRCX dropped -58.53% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.