LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE
LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) and PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan while PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGQK.DE returned 5.53%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAC.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGQK.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PAC.DE.
Performance
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQK.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than PAC.DE's 8.00% return.
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQK.DE and PAC.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between LGQK.DE and PAC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQK.DE
PAC.DE
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGQK.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.00 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 5.65 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGQK.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, roughly equal to the maximum PAC.DE drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and PAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQK.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -36.90% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -6.33% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -20.21% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -20.21% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -2.33% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -5.10% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.25% | -0.05% |
Volatility
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQK.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.19% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 8.91% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 11.77% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 14.54% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 16.52% | +8.56% |
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PAC.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGQK.DE vs. PAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LGQK.DE and PAC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for PAC.DE.
LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.16% for PAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and PAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer