LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE
LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) and BATF.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan while BATF.DE tracks the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LGQK.DE returned 10.11%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for BATF.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGQK.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for BATF.DE.
Performance
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQK.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than BATF.DE's 2.86% return.
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
BATF.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | 6.52% |
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 2.86% | 8.25% | 10.50% | -0.71% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQK.DE and BATF.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between LGQK.DE and BATF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQK.DE
BATF.DE
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGQK.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.13 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 2.74 | +3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGQK.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.61 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than BATF.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and BATF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQK.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -18.62% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -6.47% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -18.62% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -5.63% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -5.59% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.68% | -0.48% |
Volatility
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) is 3.20%, while L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that LGQK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQK.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.62% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 8.97% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 12.09% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 14.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 14.45% | +10.63% |
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BATF.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGQK.DE vs. BATF.DE - Dividend Comparison
LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while BATF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQK.DE and BATF.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATF.DE.
LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while BATF.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.16% for BATF.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and BATF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer