LGLV vs. HDLB
LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - LGLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index, while HDLB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGLV returned 8.32%/yr vs 14.37%/yr for HDLB. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for HDLB.
Performance
LGLV vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than HDLB's 25.12% return.
LGLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 10.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.95%
HDLB
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.42K | $57.41K | $57.55K | |
| $5.56M | $4.60M | $5.45M |
LGLV vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 7.61% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 3.89% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 25.12% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 62.67% | -50.94% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and HDLB is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between LGLV and HDLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGLV vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank
LGLV
HDLB
LGLV vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGLV | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.74 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 3.74 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and HDLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLV | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -78.70% | +42.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -16.17% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.17% | -20.94% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -43.81% | +26.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -5.63% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -27.01% | +23.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 7.51% | -4.56% |
Volatility
LGLV vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 4.53%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGLV | HDLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 11.39% | -6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 22.35% | -14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 28.72% | -18.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 31.06% | -18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 43.43% | -27.34% |
LGLV vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGLV vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than HDLB's 10.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 10.19% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.99% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGLV and HDLB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDLB has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to LGLV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs HDLB's -78.70%.
On 5-year performance, HDLB leads with 14.37% vs 8.32% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDLB has performed better with a 14.37% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 10.19%, compared with 1.99% for LGLV.
LGLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. LGLV tracks State Street U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 1.65% for HDLB.
LGLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGLV and HDLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer