LGLIX vs. FTQGX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX returned 18.22%/yr vs 19.75%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGLIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTQGX.

Performance

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 18.22%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.75% annualized return.

LGLIX

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 26.79%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: 18.22%

FTQGX

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 9.27%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 6M: 32.21%
• 1Y: 56.90%
• 3Y*: 30.72%
• 5Y*: 17.35%
• 10Y*: 19.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	9.43%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	35.02%	-1.08%	31.64%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	32.07%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	31.44%	4.90%	30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLIX and FTQGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2011	0.92

The correlation between LGLIX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGLIX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGLIX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.64	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	3.32	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.45	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	4.41	-3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.29	18.55	-15.26

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and FTQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGLIX	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.95%	-61.29%	+15.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.01%	-12.76%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.25%	-26.84%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.95%	-32.31%	-13.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.95%	-32.31%	-13.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	0.00%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.32%	-14.17%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.32%	3.03%	+4.29%

Volatility

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) have volatilities of 8.52% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGLIX	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	8.94%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.34%	17.12%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.33%	21.33%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	21.96%	+4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	21.71%	+3.19%

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGLIX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than FTQGX's 9.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	9.42%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.82%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGLIX and FTQGX in my portfolio?

LGLIX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGLIX or FTQGX?

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to LGLIX (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLIX dropped -45.95% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.