LGLIX vs. AWYIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) and AWYIX (CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LGLIX returned 11.55%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for AWYIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGLIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for AWYIX.

Performance

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 2.05% return.

LGLIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 6.80%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 28.69%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

AWYIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 10.13%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	10.47%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	35.02%	-5.17%
AWYIX CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund	2.05%	7.66%	18.19%	16.39%	-15.59%	29.51%	12.75%	35.07%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLIX and AWYIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between LGLIX and AWYIX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGLIX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AWYIX

AWYIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
AWYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
AWYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AWYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AWYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AWYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGLIX	AWYIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.07	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.56	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.76	4.74	-0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the AWYIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and AWYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGLIX	AWYIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.07	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.54	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.68	+0.03

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than AWYIX's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and AWYIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGLIX	AWYIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.95%	-35.79%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.01%	-8.35%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.25%	-18.72%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.95%	-19.82%	-26.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.02%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.34%	-5.02%	-4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.27%	2.23%	+5.04%

Volatility

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 2.32%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGLIX	AWYIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	2.32%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	7.44%	+8.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.07%	9.88%	+11.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.84%	14.42%	+11.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.79%	17.88%	+6.91%

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGLIX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than AWYIX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWYIX CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund	2.14%	1.74%	5.77%	1.80%	3.23%	6.35%	6.87%	3.82%	6.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.80%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGLIX and AWYIX in my portfolio?

LGLIX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGLIX or AWYIX?

LGLIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to AWYIX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLIX dropped -45.95% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.