PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGILX vs. SWTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGILX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than SWTSX's 12.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGILX having a 15.09% annualized return and SWTSX not far behind at 15.07%.


LGILX

1D
-0.04%
1M
6.21%
YTD
9.29%
6M
-5.81%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
15.09%

SWTSX

1D
0.22%
1M
5.76%
YTD
12.02%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGILX
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund
9.29%-0.54%31.98%48.08%-38.11%20.06%38.40%32.59%2.00%33.89%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
12.02%17.04%23.84%26.05%-19.54%25.65%20.71%30.90%-5.35%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LGILX and SWTSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2000

0.92

The correlation between LGILX and SWTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGILX vs. SWTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGILX
LGILX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LGILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGILX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LGILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGILX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SWTSX
SWTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SWTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGILXSWTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.38

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

15.52

-14.70

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SWTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGILX and SWTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGILXSWTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

2.45

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.75

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.81

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.44

-0.09

Drawdowns

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGILX drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than SWTSX's maximum drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGILX and SWTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGILXSWTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.74%

-54.60%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.18%

-8.88%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.18%

-19.43%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.00%

-25.40%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-35.01%

-7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

0.00%

-8.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-10.57%

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

1.93%

+9.71%

Volatility

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) at 2.96%. This indicates that LGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGILXSWTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.96%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.19%

9.21%

+9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.30%

12.26%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.25%

17.44%

+8.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

18.61%

+5.49%

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGILX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SWTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGILX vs. SWTSX - Dividend Comparison

LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGILX
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.95%18.16%13.58%13.58%5.22%8.46%8.42%13.64%1.65%0.00%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
0.98%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.62%1.46%1.63%1.92%2.58%1.83%2.32%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LGILX and SWTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LGILX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to SWTSX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGILX dropped -67.74% vs SWTSX's -54.60%.

SWTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGILX and SWTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer