LGILX vs. SWPPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX).
LGILX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 14, 1997. SWPPX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | -11.81% | -0.54% | 31.98% | 48.08% | -38.11% | 20.06% | 38.40% | 32.59% | 2.00% | 33.89% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.07% | 17.87% | 24.96% | 26.26% | -18.14% | 28.67% | 18.38% | 31.46% | -4.47% | 21.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGILX achieves a -11.81% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's -7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LGILX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 12.85%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.
LGILX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- YTD
- -11.81%
- 6M
- -22.46%
- 1Y
- -2.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
SWPPX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGILX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGILX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank
LGILX
SWPPX
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGILX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.84 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | 1.30 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.06 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 5.14 | -5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGILX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.84 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.68 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.76 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGILX and SWPPX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison
LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.95% | 18.16% | 13.58% | 13.58% | 5.22% | 8.46% | 8.42% | 13.64% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.19% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 1.79% | 2.55% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGILX drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than SWPPX's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGILX and SWPPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGILX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -55.06% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.18% | -12.10% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.00% | -24.51% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -33.80% | -9.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.18% | -8.89% | -17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.31% | -10.00% | -11.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | 2.49% | +7.61% |
Volatility
LGILX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 4.29%. This indicates that LGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGILX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.29% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 9.11% | +10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.38% | 18.14% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 16.89% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 18.19% | +5.85% |