LGILX vs. SWOBX
LGILX (Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund) and SWOBX (Schwab Balanced Fund™) are both mutual funds - LGILX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWOBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, LGILX returned 13.58%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for SWOBX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LGILX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for SWOBX.
Performance
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGILX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than SWOBX's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LGILX has outperformed SWOBX with an annualized return of 13.58%, while SWOBX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.
LGILX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- -5.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.47%
SWOBX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | -0.46% | -0.54% | 31.98% | 48.08% | -38.11% | 20.06% | 38.40% | 32.59% | 2.00% | 33.89% |
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 4.03% | 12.76% | 12.51% | 18.25% | -18.86% | 14.76% | 14.73% | 20.13% | -4.35% | 15.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGILX and SWOBX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 1997 | 0.91 |
The correlation between LGILX and SWOBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGILX vs. SWOBX — Risk / Return Rank
LGILX
SWOBX
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGILX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.20 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.61 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 6.48 | -7.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGILX drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than SWOBX's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGILX and SWOBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGILX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -35.99% | -31.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.18% | -6.58% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.18% | -11.72% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.00% | -28.30% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -28.30% | -14.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.69% | -2.11% | -14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -6.19% | -15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.81% | 1.63% | +11.18% |
Volatility
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) at 2.69%. This indicates that LGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWOBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGILX | SWOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 2.69% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 7.64% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 9.37% | +13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 14.06% | +12.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 12.90% | +11.29% |
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGILX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SWOBX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGILX vs. SWOBX - Dividend Comparison
LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.95% | 18.16% | 13.58% | 13.58% | 5.22% | 8.46% | 8.42% | 13.64% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 5.26% | 5.47% | 4.94% | 5.67% | 10.21% | 6.47% | 2.97% | 5.21% | 7.11% | 3.20% | 7.83% | 7.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LGILX and SWOBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LGILX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to SWOBX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGILX dropped -67.74% vs SWOBX's -35.99%.
SWOBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGILX and SWOBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer