LGILX vs. SFNNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX).
LGILX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 14, 1997. SFNNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007.
Performance
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.44% | -0.54% | 31.98% | 48.08% | -38.11% | 20.06% | 38.40% | 32.59% | 2.00% | 33.89% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 7.49% | 41.06% | 2.27% | 19.88% | -7.95% | 14.38% | 4.35% | 18.09% | -13.96% | 23.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGILX achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LGILX has outperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.98% annualized return.
LGILX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -19.88%
- 1Y
- 0.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
SFNNX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGILX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGILX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank
LGILX
SFNNX
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGILX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 2.40 | -2.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 3.03 | -2.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.47 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 3.47 | -3.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 13.20 | -13.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGILX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 2.40 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.80 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.64 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGILX and SFNNX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison
LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.95% | 18.16% | 13.58% | 13.58% | 5.22% | 8.46% | 8.42% | 13.64% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 4.76% | 5.11% | 3.61% | 3.26% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.42% | 3.69% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.21% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGILX drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, which is greater than SFNNX's maximum drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGILX and SFNNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGILX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -59.60% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.18% | -10.96% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.00% | -25.66% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -40.23% | -2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.36% | -7.73% | -15.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.31% | -12.06% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 2.88% | +7.30% |
Volatility
LGILX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) is 6.98%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that LGILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGILX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 7.48% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 10.99% | +8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.60% | 16.49% | +10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 15.46% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 17.28% | +6.79% |