LGI vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) and CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) are both funds - LGI is a Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Over the past 3 years, LGI returned 17.73%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGI charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

LGI vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGI achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 2.53% return.

LGI

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 23.21%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGI vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	8.63%	21.36%	14.00%	3.94%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.53%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LGI and CLOZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023	0.15

The correlation between LGI and CLOZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGI vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGI

LGI Risk / Return Rank: 20
LGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
LGI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LGI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGI vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGI	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.81	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.31	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.60	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	5.31	-1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGI vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGI and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGI	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.81	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	2.77	-2.37

Drawdowns

LGI vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGI drawdown since its inception was -63.34%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGI and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGI	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.34%	-5.32%	-58.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.25%	-3.90%	-17.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-5.32%	-16.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.13%	-0.12%	-6.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.95%	-0.38%	-10.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	1.17%	+4.60%

Volatility

LGI vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.42%. This indicates that LGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGI	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	0.42%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	3.13%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	3.45%	+12.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.29%	3.80%	+15.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	3.80%	+16.31%

LGI vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGI has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGI vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

LGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, more than CLOZ's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.39%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.88%	10.08%	9.19%	7.32%	10.22%	9.77%	7.17%	6.44%	19.88%	5.46%	6.94%	8.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGI and CLOZ in my portfolio?

LGI and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGI or CLOZ?

LGI has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to CLOZ (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGI dropped -63.34% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.