LGHT vs. USO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - LGHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Langar, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. LGHT is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, LGHT returned -14.70% vs 52.40% for USO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. LGHT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

LGHT vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGHT achieves a -12.10% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 70.32% return.

LGHT

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 6.99%
• 6M: -15.54%
• YTD: -12.10%
• 1Y: -14.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USO

• 1D: 8.36%
• 1M: -6.09%
• 6M: 64.40%
• YTD: 70.32%
• 1Y: 52.40%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 18.84%
• 10Y*: 2.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGHT vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF	-12.10%	-1.66%	0.23%
USO United States Oil Fund LP	70.32%	-8.46%	12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LGHT and USO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2024	-0.15

The correlation between LGHT and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGHT vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGHT

LGHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
LGHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LGHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LGHT Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LGHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LGHT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

USO

USO Risk / Return Rank: 41
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGHT vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGHT	USO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	1.17	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	1.84	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.23	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	1.62	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	4.37	-5.52

LGHT vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGHT and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGHT vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and USO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGHT	USO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-98.19%	+69.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.57%	-32.49%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.97%	-87.47%	+66.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-75.35%	+67.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.79%	12.04%	+0.75%

Volatility

LGHT vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) is 7.20%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.93%. This indicates that LGHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGHT	USO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	14.93%	-7.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.55%	40.72%	-25.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	44.98%	-25.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	36.69%	-17.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	39.07%	-19.86%

LGHT vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGHT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGHT vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGHT nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGHT and USO in my portfolio?

LGHT and USO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGHT or USO?

USO has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to LGHT (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGHT dropped -28.60% vs USO's -98.19%.

Which ETF is better, LGHT or USO?

On 1-year performance, USO leads with 52.40% vs -14.70% for LGHT. On fees, LGHT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, LGHT has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGHT or USO?

Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 52.40% return vs -14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGHT or USO?

LGHT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGHT or USO?

LGHT and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LGHT and USO?

LGHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Langar and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGHT and 0.86% for USO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.