LGHT vs. GERM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. LGHT is actively managed, while GERM is passively managed. Over the past year, LGHT returned -14.70% vs 0.00% for GERM. LGHT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.

Performance

LGHT vs. GERM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LGHT

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 6.99%
• 6M: -15.54%
• YTD: -12.10%
• 1Y: -14.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GERM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGHT vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF	-12.10%	-1.66%	-2.42%
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

LGHT vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGHT	GERM
Healthcare	98.0%	99.3%
Technology	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.4%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LGHT vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGHT

LGHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
LGHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LGHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LGHT Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LGHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LGHT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GERM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGHT vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGHT	GERM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	—	—

Drawdowns

LGHT vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and GERM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGHT	GERM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	0.00%	-28.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.57%	0.00%	-25.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.97%	0.00%	-20.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	0.00%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.79%	0.00%	+12.79%

Volatility

LGHT vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison

Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that LGHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGHT	GERM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	0.00%	+7.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.55%	0.00%	+15.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	0.00%	+19.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	0.00%	+19.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	0.00%	+19.21%

LGHT vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGHT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGHT vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGHT nor GERM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, LGHT or GERM?

LGHT has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGHT dropped -28.60% vs GERM's 0.00%.

Which ETF is better, LGHT or GERM?

On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -14.70% for LGHT. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGHT or GERM?

Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGHT or GERM?

GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGHT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGHT or GERM?

LGHT and GERM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LGHT and GERM?

They also come from different issuers: Langar and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGHT and 0.68% for GERM.