LGHT vs. GERM
LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. LGHT is actively managed, while GERM is passively managed. Over the past year, LGHT returned -22.28% vs 0.00% for GERM. LGHT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
LGHT vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LGHT
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -19.52%
- 6M
- -20.39%
- 1Y
- -22.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGHT vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF | -19.52% | -1.66% | -1.72% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGHT vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGHT
GERM
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
LGHT
GERM
Basic Materials
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Consumer Defensive
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Energy
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Financial Services
LGHT
-
GERM
Industrials
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Technology
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Utilities
LGHT
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGHT vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
LGHT
GERM
LGHT vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGHT | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGHT | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LGHT vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGHT | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | 0.00% | -28.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.57% | 0.00% | -25.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.64% | 0.00% | -27.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | 0.00% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.92% | 0.00% | +10.92% |
Volatility
LGHT vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that LGHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGHT | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 0.00% | +5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 0.00% | +13.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.29% | 0.00% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 0.00% | +18.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 0.00% | +18.89% |
LGHT vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGHT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGHT vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGHT nor GERM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGHT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGHT dropped -28.60% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -22.28% for LGHT. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -22.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGHT.
LGHT and GERM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Langar and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGHT and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for LGHT and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer