LGHT vs. TRUH
LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGHT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
LGHT vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LGHT
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- 6M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 1Y
- -13.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.99%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.43K | $23.15K | $16.97K | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
LGHT vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF | -0.38% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGHT and TRUH is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGHT vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
LGHT
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LGHT vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGHT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGHT vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGHT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -4.51% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.09% | -2.75% | -19.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -1.64% | -6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.61% | — | — |
Volatility
LGHT vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGHT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.62% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 17.62% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 17.62% | +1.80% |
LGHT vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGHT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGHT vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
LGHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF | 0.00% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGHT and TRUH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGHT.
TRUH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for LGHT.
They also come from different issuers: Langar and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGHT and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for LGHT and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer